Cartoon of the Day
June 23rd, 2008
Jessi notes…….
Voted against banning partial birth abortion
Obama’s record in Illinois represents that of a pragmatic progressive, who pushed for moderate reforms and opposed right-wing legislation. In the IL legislature, voting “present” is the equivalent of voting “no” because a majority of “yes” votes are required for passage. Many IL legislators use the “present” vote as an evasion on an unpopular choice, so that they can avoid being targeted for voting “no.” During the 2004 Democratic primary, an opponent mocked Obama’s “present” vote on abortion bills with flyers portraying a rubber duck and the words, “He ducked!”.
In 1997, Obama voted against SB 230, which would have turned doctors into felons by banning so-called partial-birth abortion, & against a 2000 bill banning state funding. Although these bills included an exception to save the life of the mother, they didn’t include anything about abortions necessary to protect the health of the mother. The legislation defined a fetus as a person, & could have criminalized virtually all abortion.
Source: The Improbable Quest, by John K. Wilson, p.147-148 Oct 30, 2007
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized
2 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1. Brian Schimming | June 26th, 2008 at 2:21 am
As “Mr. Eloquence” aka, “Mr. Change”, Mr. “Breath of Fresh Air” seeks to “be honest with the American people” - by trying to blur his sorry voting record, the facts should make at least a little difference. The effort described below is just one of the line-blurring ways.
__________
MAIN STREET By WILLIAM MCGURN
NARAL Catholics Line Up for Obama
June 24, 2008; Page A17
You are the Democratic candidate for president. You want to reach out to Catholics. So what do you do when the majority of the elected officials on your National Catholic Advisory Council have the seal of approval from NARAL Pro-Choice America?
That’s the position Barack Obama now finds himself in. A few months ago, his Catholic advisory council was announced with great enthusiasm, and Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.) was listed as a national co-chair. His appearance at the top of the council sent a clear message: This campaign is determined to recover some of the lost Democratic sheep who have gravitated to the GOP over abortion.
This council does indeed include some Catholics whose pro-life credentials are impeccable, including Minnesota Congressman James Oberstar. But let us also stipulate the obvious: Of the 21 senators, congressmen and governors listed on the council’s National Leadership Committee, 17 have a 90%-100% NARAL approval rating. Even Mr. Casey now enjoys a 65% NARAL approval rating.
It’s not as if these NARAL scores are outliers: Sen. Obama himself boasts a 100% NARAL rating, and for good reason. In a speech before Planned Parenthood, he declared that the right to an abortion is at stake in this election, and vowed that he would not yield on appointing judges that would uphold Roe v. Wade.
Mr. Obama is for using tax dollars to fund abortions, and against restrictions on partial-birth abortion. In the Illinois Senate, he voted against legislation protecting a child who was born alive despite an abortion. In sum, if you want to know what Mr. Obama’s policies mean, it’s this: taxpayer-funded abortion on demand.
Not fair, complains the Obama camp. They point to statements supporting adoption. They cite the story about how he removed language about “right-wing ideologues” from one of his Web sites after a pro-life doctor complained. Above all, they say he has acknowledged a moral dimension to abortion, that he’s willing to listen, and that he wants to work for fewer abortions.
All very true. Yet this defense reflects a common complaint about the Obama campaign in general: When you look past the soothing language about “change” and the willingness to “listen,” the actual policies and voting record are to the left of Ted Kennedy’s and Bernie Sanders’.
It’s a tough sell to present this record as auguring an America where there are fewer abortions. But some try. Generally there are two lines of argument. The first is to claim that Republicans have done nothing during their time in power to diminish abortion. Plainly this is not the view that Planned Parenthood promotes on its Web site, where President Bush’s many actions are chronicled and listed under the heading “war on women.” As Mr. Obama himself notes, moreover, Republicans generally do not appoint the kind of judges the pro-choice side demands: That is, judges who can be counted on to impose their own views upon the law on issues that ought properly be left to the American people.
The other line of argument is the They’re-Just-As-Bad-As-We-Are defense. Thus the Web sites that go on and on about Catholic social teaching on war and poverty and greed and the death penalty, etc. The implication being, of course, that Republicans are on the wrong side of all these issues – and that simply by enumerating all these concerns, you can somehow balance out the Democratic Party’s singular commitment to abortion on demand.
These issues are all legitimate subjects for debate, and each can and should be argued. The problem is that abortion is not just any issue. In the language of the church, abortion is an “intrinsic evil,” always and everywhere wrong.
That is what Catholics for Obama have to get around. Given this awkward fact, the political reality is that a National Catholic Advisory Council may do less to advance Mr. Obama than to alert the public about how extreme his votes and policies are – not to mention the similar votes and policies of the Catholic politicians supporting him. Already Kathleen Sebelius – governor of Kansas and one of the Catholic co-chairs – has been asked by her bishop to refrain from Communion because of what he says is her support for abortion. As for Sen. Casey, well, let’s just say it’s hard to imagine his sainted father – who bucked his party’s president and refused to support his old friend Sen. Harris Wofford’s 1994 re-election bid over the life issue – lending his imprimatur to such a NARAL-friendly enterprise.
It’s not that Catholic Democrats lack a moral language. Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.), for example, is another Catholic council member who also enjoys a 100% NARAL approval rating. During recent Senate hearings, he accused oil company executives of having “all the compassion of Burmese generals.”
When Mr. Durbin is willing to use similar language to describe the taking of innocent, unborn life, we’ll know we have change we can believe in.
2. wakeupamerica | June 27th, 2008 at 9:35 am
Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow - 6/26/2008 10:25:00 AM
A coalition of African-American pastors and leaders are taking both major political parties to task over continued public funding of Planned Parenthood.
Dr. Alveda King is part of the group marching on Republican and Democratic National Headquarters in Washington. King says they are demanding that Planned Parenthood be de-funded.
Planned Parenthood, a non-profit organization, receives more than $300 million in tax funds and allegedly makes a profit. “Planned Parenthood is a leading provider of abortifacients, birth control, abortion counseling, and all of that,” says King. “And Planned Parenthood will take money to kill African-American babies.”
She says the federally funded group has a habit of locating abortion facilities in minority neighborhoods, and that it hides behind the “cloak of women’s rights.” “… [I]n that false promise of women’s rights, they take away the basic civil rights of America’s weakest and most vulnerable,” she continues. “And by their abortion activities, they are taking the lives and civil rights of little babies ….”
Statistics indicate that out of the 50 million unborn babies who have been killed through abortion, approximately 15 million were African-American. And King says the work that Planned Parenthood is doing is “anti-civil rights.”
According to King, the coalition also will be demanding that the presidential candidates of both major parties decline to accept any of the $10 million Planned Parenthood plans to donate to campaigns.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=153650